Saturday, June 13, 2015

Andrew Sullivan/Daily Kos To Investigate,If Wonkette's Schoenkopf Really,Like Palin,Gave Birth To Her Child?

Andrew Sullivan advised that whether or not Sarah Palin actually gave birth to her "son" Trig was a "legitimate question." On that basis, Wonkette's editor Rebecca Schoenkopf also being a public figure surely both Sullivan and Daily Kos should do the same sort of legitimate questioning.

We have only one picture of the alleged Schoenkopf baby but THERE IS NO CLEARLY IDENTIFIABLE PICTURE OF THE MOTHER WHOEVER THAT MAY BE.
Donna Rose attends her very first Wonkette Drinky Thing

Here is the picture that the 'Trig Truthers" refused to accept as being proof that then Governor Palin was pregnant with Trig "she's wearing a "fat suit" in a faked photo"

On the same basis, even if the picture purporting to show Schoenkopf is her what proof is there that the baby is actually hers? Andrew Sullivan intimates that the Palin's could easily have paid of the hospital staff who would then cover up for the "faked birth."

"Oh, God: Andrew Sullivan  Frets Palin's Money Could Intimidate a Hospital Into Covering Up a Fake-Pregnancy Changeling-Baby Conspiracy

Then the left produced these "theories"
 New Theory! The daughter got pregnant, but to hide that fact, they aborted it, and then Sarah Palin faked a pregnancy "as a distraction."
Then they hunted and killed a pregnant teenaged runaway and presented this changeling-baby as Sarah Palin's own."

Perhaps the Daily Kos theory that Karl Rove started the "Fake Trig birth" story to have it picked up by Kos so they could be discredited later applies to Schoenkopf? Is it a false flag story to have conservatives make the same claims only to have proof that the child is really hers and thus embarrass the right wing? Could be-who knows?

Ace of Spades HQ found further Trig speculation which, who knows may also have bearing on Schoenkopf's alleged child.

"Here's a twist. Maybe Trig is... tiny little Piper's baby.
Maybe Bristol is not Trig's mother ...but there are 3 other adult children in the Palin family ...maybe one of them? I find it hard to swallow that a woman who already had 4 grown children would elect to have a 5th at the age of 44 ! It seems logical that a 4 month old baby would belong to someone much younger ...Am I making sense ?
Perfect sense. Please, do go on.
But, may I ask: Where is the person or persons who... care for you? Are you allowed to access a computer without... proper supervision?
And, okay, this doesn't exactly prove I'm gifted with psychic foresight, but yeah, as scheduled, the comparisons of Sarah Palin's form to fat-suits has begun:
If the 6 and 7 month photos are to be believed of the Governor, but so too are the ones online at 8 months (provided by Republicans bloggers), I think there is a prosthetic device being employed here that could just as easily be worn by the daughter now to continue the story-line. (See sample here:
Sure, Sarah Palin slips out of the pregnancy suit, slips it right on to Bristol. Like passing down an engagement ring. Awwwww...
Hey, here's a question:
How do you know Trig is even real?
Kinda small. Doesn't talk much... I think you're missing the obvious:Trig's an animatronic babybot."

Unless a birth certificate is provided and the alleged delivery doctor confirms the birth, and hospital staff swear on an affidavit that they were not paid "hush money" then, as Andrew Sullivan advised "legitimate questions" arise. Certainly if it was perfect OK for the left to indulge in all this speculation regarding Sarah Palin then the same must apply to an absolute representative of the same type of leftist Schoenkopf.

Or is the Alinskyite methodology not valid?

"This is from Democratic Underground. (I don't want to link them, either, but I'll so so here.)
Let the left explain their game in plain words:
NoodleyAppendage (1000+ posts) Sat Aug-30-08 10:26122. What many here don't understand. It doesn't matter if it's true or not. RUMOR IS TRUTH.
The modern laws of media hype and political warfare have a useful tenet:
Repeat ANYTHING or raise false concern over ANYTHING and it is likely to be planted in the conscious/subconscious of many voters.
If people start to think that there might be something fishy with Palin's last kid (if hers), then that's FINE. One more doubt (whether tied to reality or not) is another hesitation at the ballot box.
GET WITH THE PROGRAM PEOPLE. The "rising above it" bullshit has served us so well in the past, hasn't it?
If you have problems with the story, then STFU and get out of the way of Dems who are engaged in MODERN POLITICAL WARFARE. Go tend your garden or some other pedestrian task, because the "concern trolls" are not helping shape the message."

It will be recalled the media ran stories "Palin had affair with her husband's business partner" which the left gleefully ran with. Is it fair then for the same media to write "Schoenkopf's love child is the product of an affair with 'Immoral Minority's' blog's Jesse Gryphen? 

That would be speculation of course just  like with Palin as of course would be the other media "scandal "Palin to get divorced" which would read "Schoenkopf and husband"Shypixel" (sic) to get divorced." "Shypixel had an affair with a massage therapist" could also be a speculative headline like the one the leftist "Village Voice" ran about Todd Palin.

Of course "Schoenkopf's "Wonkette gleefully ran an article which purported to advise Palin had had breast implant but I would never stoop to such a level about her as that would be wrong.Whether "Shypixel has had such-who knows??

To assist with solving all these mysteries would dead Joe McGinniss move next door to the Schoenkopf's to write an expose like he did with the Palin's? Could such a book could cover pregnancy out of wedlock, requests for alcohol, and other grifting from Wonkette readers and so much more?