Would Palin Have Let Romney Have A Pass In N.Hampshire Debate Like The Silent Five? Heck NO!

The media, post the New Hampshire debates have rolled over and let Romney tickle their collective tummies assigning him the nomination. Frankly, who could blame them after the sad and sorrowful "performance" by the silent five other "candidates." 


These are just a few article from REAL CLEAR POLITICS which crown Romney and gleefully, or in sorrow, discuss how Romney didn't have glove laid on him whilst the others attacked each other. So pathetic and embarrassing.


Even staunch Santorum defender Stacy McCain is "feeling kind of cranky tonight"


"Romney Coasts as others walk" Washington Post
"Romney lays low in GOP debate"
"GOP debate see few swings at Romney"


Of course the establishment wants Romney, the liberal media want Romney so they can unleash on him in due course. The rank and file don't want Romney, but sadly the opposition to him is not only dividing the non-Romney vote, but instead of taking the game to him they are attacking and destroying each other.


Whether that is in the belief they will get the VP nod, or poor politics, who knows, what is known is that this cowardice is a sad and sorry spectacle. I am particularly saddened at the spectacle of Gingrich not taking the fight to Romney on the debate stage.


Now here is a question for conservatives; 


COULD YOU IMAGINE PALIN HOLDING BACK AND LETTING ROMNEY HAVE A FREE RUN AT THE NOMINATION?


The Palin who just said about Gingrich that you can't win playing defense all the time?


If the GOP lets Romney get the nomination, if the other candidates roll over and let him have a clear run at it in the name of, who knows what "party unity"? Then they deserve to lose-the  weak candidates and the GOP nominee. One other thing is certain, Palin the fighter, 
towers above these political midgets.