M.JOSEPH SHEPPARD'S "A POINT OF VIEW": June 2015

Tuesday, June 30, 2015

Trump Proves Beltway Elitists Wrong (Again),Great Financial Cost Shows He's Serious Candidate

Whether he's agreed with or not presidential candidate Donald Trump has, once again, proven the elitist naysayers wrong-actually wrong over and over again in a matter of days.

When he indicated he might run there was a chorus of derision from the Beltway pundits (here's a partial list) who said it was just a publicity stunt to promote his reality shows and he would never run.

Then when he made the announcement that he was running they poured utter scorn on his announcement speech "rambling and incoherent." The they said, "he won't follow through and register with the Electoral Commission" which of course he did straight away.

Then they said he would never attract any support, straight after which he leapt into second place in the New Hampshire polls above all the other candidates except Bush who he is only a few points behind. "that's New Hampshire" they sneered-Pat Robertson did the same thing with his populist message which appeals to the Granite States populist leaning voters-but he won't get any traction nationwide"

Then, right on schedule, the next nationwide poll came out which showed Trump, once again, in second place.

Next up the Beltway, having exhausted all the previous nay-saying, have resorted to the crystal ball; So now the chorus is singing in unison "he will damage the Republican brand because he is getting so much support and will have to be included in the debates."

And "he may have had a short term lift in the polls but in the medium term he will fail to get any traction." Well we shall see, all we can say with certainty is that the pundits have been dead wrong about him so far as they view him from their Olympian heights with the action of their nostrils skywards.

What has been enjoyable through all this is to see the Beltway pundit class show their true elitist colors, basically it's another version of their flyover country attacks circa 2008, but in Trump they have someone who fights back hard, who can't be bought by them, and owes them nothing.

Again, one may or may not agree with Trump, bearing in mind you have to sort through the media's grossly biased reporting to understand what Trump actually said and meant, before it is fair to decide ones views about his comments/positions. But one thing is certain, rather than using his run as publicity tool Trump has taken one for the team in an amazing display of dedication to his political cause.

Trump's statements on Mexican immigration have cost him potentially millions of dollars in lost revenue. Both Univision, which is his beauty contest platform, and NBC, have announced they will no longer partner with him. He also left his big earning NBC show "The Apprentice" to make his presidential run.

This shows that Trump means political business no matter what the cost, is unafraid to take a political position no matter the media attacks that ensue, that he is beholden to no fundraisers whether overt or covert, and that he has put the lie to the pundits once again.

Monday, June 29, 2015

Rand Paul Main Benefactor From SCOTUS ?

The Supreme Court Decisions on Obamacare and same-sex marriage

have, as many observers pointed out, given the Republican Party a major fillip for the 2016 presidential election.

The decisions, once the hullabaloo has settled down, removed two contentious and, for the left, highly energizing issues which would, if not dealt with as they have been, ensured the largest potential Dem turnout.

Not only turnout, but also financial and propaganda support from the Gay lobby associated with the media and Hollywood/television. All that has been negated. As one commentator has noted it also may mean a swing to the GOP by Gays who can now look to their financial well being as a primary political concern, and may see the fiscal conservatism on offer from the GOP as a more logical home for their votes.

With, as usual, the presidential election turning on Florida, Virginia, Ohio (and now Colorado) where the margins of victory range from e.g. Florida at one half of a percent to the other three as easily winnable, any slight advantage can make or break the election for either candidate.

Sean Trende, writing at real Clear Politics produced an encyclopedic analysis of the 2012 presidential election and decided that yes, there were a substantial number of "missing White voters" who, if they had turned out for Romney would not have decided the election for him but would have made the result much closer.

Trende identifies these as "Perot voters" (others identify them as "Reagan Democrats" or "Blue Collar Voters" I suspect they are pretty much one and the same).

"For those with long memories, this stands out as the heart of the “Perot coalition.” That coalition was strongest with secular, blue-collar, often rural voters who were turned off by Bill Clinton’s perceived liberalism and George H.W. Bush’s elitism"

How to attract these voters is of course a key and Trende identifies Perot type populism (which may be why Donald trump has jumped into second place in polls after he formally announced.)

"This GOP would have to be more "America first" on trade, immigration and foreign policy; less pro-Wall Street and big business in its rhetoric; more Main Street/populist on economics."

Trende acknowledges an outreach to Hispanic voters may be of value, but the fruits of such an outreach do not appear to be more valuable than the possible gains amongst Perot voters.

In another article Trende acknowledges that by themselves even maximum gains from Perot voters may not be enough to give the Electoral College edge and advised that a further outreach to other bloc's including Hispanics and Blacks could, if successful, and when added to the "missing Whites" provide the winning coalition.

He makes the point that without President Obama running;

"Hillary Clinton, could have a greater appeal to these voters (current polling suggests that she does). But there are always tradeoffs, and Clinton’s greater appeal to blue-collar whites, to the extent it holds through 2016, could be offset by a less visceral attachment with young voters, college-educated whites and to nonwhites than the president enjoys."

This is where Senator Paul might be the best vote winner for the Republicans. "Young voters, college educated Whites" have clearly found Paul attractive for his libertarian views and he stands every chance of making inroads into that grouping. Further those who were energized by "Hope and Change" may find themselves disillusioned, or find Hillary Clinton not exactly a poster person for youthful enthusiasms as Obama was.

Black turnout, as Trende intimates, may also not be as strong for Hillary as it was, at near unanimous levels, for Obama. But there is another aspect which was highlighted By Rev. Al Sharpton-Paul being the only Republican candidate who has made substantial efforts to substantially interact with, and learn from, the Black community.

Sharpton, no doubt correctly, advises that there would be little chance of many Blacks voting for the GOP nominee because of this but, as he describes it, there is a real danger for the Democrats from Paul;

Sharpton, after describing how Rand Paul has interacted with the Black community (and him) said Paul’s efforts to engage black voters could present a strategic challenge for Democrats:

"If the Republican senator runs for president, fewer African Americans may be motivated to show up and vote against him. If he becomes the candidate … and if you don’t get a huge black turnout saying ‘We’re afraid [of him],’” that could be a pitfall for Democrats."

Thus Paul could energize the youth vote, reduce the Black vote turnout and, given his father's populist reputation, appeal to the Perot "Missing White's" potentially mass vote turnout. With a pro-life history, and a personality that has brought grudging respect from Dem's for it's seriousness of intent, and no scandals, Senator Paul has a very strong case to present both to the voters and to the GOP bigwigs who can count Electoral College votes as well as anyone else.

As I wrote elsewhere, ("This Week Sewed Up The Presidency For The GOP") in my opinion what looked like a disastrous week for the Republicans could, with the right candidate, turn out to be a blessing in disguise with the distraction of the social issues removed from the campaign.

On the other hand those non-Perot "missing White voters" who are religious social conservatives who didn't vote for Romney because of perceived elitism, or his Mormonism, may also turnout because of SCOTUS because they are so upset by the decisions that they will vote for whomever the nominee is.

Is Senator Paul the candidate who can unite, or at least motivate all these disparate groups whilst depressing Dem turnout? Certainly the potential coalition numbers stack up very impressively and, allied with a Hispanic running mate, he could present a forwards looking alternative to "Hillary of the past."

UPDATE: Did Senator Paul just lose the potential conservative base support-one interpretation is that this libertarian approach validates any sort of contractual arrangement including group "marriage"/incest marriage if there is no regulation.

"Government Should Get Out of the Marriage Business Altogether should not prevent people making contracts" http://time.com/3939374/rand-paul-gay-marriage-supreme-court/ …

Saturday, June 27, 2015

This Week Sewed Up The Presidency For The GOP 2016

Yes of course the SCOTUS rulings on Obamacare and Same-Sex marriage plus the passage of the TPP Bill were huge setbacks for the Republican base. Note, not the Republican Establishment which enabled President Obama to have the TPP bill passed rather, the Boehner/McConnell coalition which had a great week.

The Democratic "progressive" base had a mixed week with same-sex marriage passing and the Palin family being once again in the wars. Oh how they savored that-the various Democratic luminaries family problems e.g. Biden's son being discharged out of the navy with drug issues passing them by as "personal."

On the other hand the passage of the TPP bill against the wishes of the unions and many liberal Senators and Nancy Pelosi, saw them rail against 'traitor" Obama.

What this week brought for the Republican base was the potential for the presidency in 2016, and with it a continuing, if not even greater majority in the House and the saving of the narrow majority in the Senate.

In the latter case that was further augmented by the decision of former Democratic senator for North Carolina Kay Hagan not to run in 2016, which means the likely retention of the previously contestable seat by the GOP.

But more than anything else the actions of an activist judiciary enabling, without the voice of the people being expressed in the ballot, universal same-sex marriage. There followed potentially subsequent opening of private individuals businesses to court directives as to whom they may wish to serve, and the possible implications for religious institutions and personal religious views.

These actions will have galvanised conservatives.

To that electric shock can be added the spectacle of supposedly conservative Congressional leaders and various lawmakers enabling President Obama. then there was the near insane over-reaction to the Confederate Flag, and all things associated with the Civil War, to the point of calling for exhuming former leaders and withdrawing from sale historical war games videos which featured the flag on the 1862 battlefield!

There have been many calls from conservative leading lights to boycott the 2016 presidential election "if a RINO, especially Jeb Bush is nominated" as, to quote Hillary, "what difference does it make." That was my opinion as well, which is part of the reason I sat out the 2012 election as did millions of other conservatives and "Perot voters and blue collar Dem's."*

The events of this past week have completely changed my mind. No matter who the Republican nominee is (with one exception, if the party is so mad as to nominate Romney again then I will vote for the Conservatives), even Chris Christie or Jeb Bush, I will vote for them. Of course I would prefer a genuine conservative, but there is too much at stake not to ensure Hillary is defeated.

The 2012 election was lost by wafer thin margins in Florida and narrowly in Virginia and Ohio. With the populist message from the likes of a Donald Trump (whether or not he is the nominee) in front of the missing voters, and the story of the past week relayed to the previous stay at home conservatives and Perot-ite's, then the election will be won.

That being said, if the message from this week is not loudly, courageously and vehemently stated over and over, and the threat to traditional values and the best interest of what remains of the industrial base workers not highlighted, then the Republican Establishment will deserve to lose.

Whether in the long run that is a good thing is a matter for another article. The impact and opportunity this past week has presented must not be squandered by a cowardly and gutless leadership running to the middle which worked out terribly in 2012 and would again.

*Addendum;

Yes, the Missing Whites Matter

By Sean Trende - July 12, 2013

"If we use the census data throughout for all of our projections, we actually end up observing 5.9 million fewer whites than anticipated. We also end up with only about 1.3 million missing non-whites, rather than the 2.6 million missing non-whites from my original calculations, taken from the exit polls.** Again, many of these are Hispanics and Asians, who in reality have lower registration and participation rates than our 55 percent estimate. You can actually use the census data to estimate these things in multiple ways (this runs into some of the peculiarities of the census data I mentioned), but they all end up pointing back to the same conclusion: About 6 million fewer whites voted than we would have expected.

My conclusion is that Republicans should pay attention to the concerns of the millions of alienated working-class voters who sat out the 2012 election because the GOP needs them -- not at the exclusion of minority voters, many of whom are also working class, but in addition to them -- to form a winning coalition in the future."

Friday, June 26, 2015

M.Joseph Sheppard Post Report 06/26/15:Trump's Not Pat Robertson/Palin Hater Media Midgets Abound

Mitch Halperin and John Heilemann discuss presidential candidate Donald Trump's "surprising numbers" i.e. the fact that he is, immediately after launching his campaign, in second place in New Hampshire.

The pair, rightly show up the various talking heads who express shock and awe at Trump's rise. I have elsewhere described this as a rude awakening for a snobby media class who just don't get it because they don't have any connection with the real world where the person in the street lives.

Halperin is in error though when he states that Trump's rise should have been seen as it is a mirror image of Pat Robertson's success in the same state. He ascribes Robertson's and Trump's success due to a connection with the man in the street on populist issues (which again escape the media snobs).

The error is in not recognizing that Robertson's success also had a strong element of his Evangelical connection. That Trump is doing so well without an overt Evangelical connection makes his achievement, so far, even more impressive than Robertson's.

That is confirmed by Trump, in a poll subsequent to this video, also being in second place, remarkably, nationwide.

*******************************************************************

Sarah Palin, through her trials and tribulations,(the latest being of course her daughter Bristol's broken engagement and pregnancy) which would have made Jog give up altogether, stands as a rock of Christian faith and commitment through all the trials brought upon her by a hateful leftist media,mad haters and Democratic party scoundrels.

I have expanded on this HERE ("Palin is Job") but will just add that my admiration for this woman is boundless and I am proud to have been a supporter for so long. Whether she advances politically or retires solely to business matters I wish her, and hers, every happiness. How she puts up with all the rubbish thrown at her is beyond my understanding-again it can only be a product of faith.

************************************************************************

Speaking of the above all the midgets,ankle biters and whale's lice have come out to froth and gibber and hate on Palin after she has parted ways with Fox. Special recognition for being absolute jerks goes to:

Vanity Fair's @JamesWolcott calls palin "brittle relic of yesterday" but he is a nobody, never was and never will be-she's done better

Doug Mataconis leads charge of nobodies/never were's 2pronounce Palin done (again)She'll be around when they are gone http://palin4president2016.blogspot.co.nz/2015/06/doug-mataconis-finally-succumbs-to.html …

Politico's @mikeallen with site's PDS "Fox drops Sarah Palin" "Fox confirms amicably parted ways" So Palin may have quit not been "dropped'?

@DanielBukszpan<"freelance" i.e. unemployed writer another nobody hack attack "It's so over for (of 100 most important Americans) Palin"

*************************************

Wednesday, June 24, 2015

Biden For President 2016-Worse Things Could Happen (especially Given the Dem Alternative)

Bill Press at 'The Hill' asks "Why Not Joe (Biden) For 2016?

Bill Press, The Hill: (Via C4P)

"During his 36 years in the Senate, he served as chairman of both the Foreign Relations and Judiciary committees, building an outstanding record on a wide variety of issues that reflect his own middle-class background, including consumer and environmental protection, the minimum wage, college aid, arms control and campaign reform.

Biden opposed the Gulf War in 1991. And while he voted to authorize the Iraq War in 2002 — as did Clinton, who was then a senator from New York — he soon admitted his “mistake,” becoming an early advocate of letting Iraq break up into three ethnic states — a solution that may still prove to be the best outcome. He himself cites the Violence Against Women Act as “the single most significant legislation” he crafted as senator.

Over the last six years, Biden has proven to be one of our most effective vice presidents ever, tapped by Obama to lead several critical initiatives, including managing the 2009 stimulus package and shaping gun safety legislation. He’s the president’s go-to guy in dealing with Congress, as evidenced by the presence of both Republican Leader Mitch McConnell and Democratic Leader Harry Reid, as well as many other senators, at Beau Biden’s funeral.

Of course, every candidate has his or her shortcomings. Biden has two — his age and his malaprops — but neither are serious. He may be 72, but he’s a vigorous and healthy 72, whom nobody doubts could handle the demands of the presidency. And while he may occasionally say something politically incorrect or just downright dumb, most people laugh and chalk that up as just Joe being Joe."More.

************************************************************************

My two cents: Bill Press ruins what is a reasonable exposition by a churlish reference to "The Republican clown car"

and advises the Dem's have "four credible candidates." These include Lincoln Chafee and Bernie Sanders. That Chafee and Sanders are 'credible" is in the eye of the (prejudiced) beholder-many would not agree with Press in his enthusiasm.

It is beyond dumb to consider that there are not four candidates amongst the GOP declared ones who are not equal or superior to Chafee and Sanders, and who are perfectly capable of being president, as much as Biden and Hillary.

He then praises Biden's accomplishments and experience, and concludes with "And while he may occasionally say something politically incorrect or just downright dumb, most people laugh and chalk that up as just Joe being Joe." They laugh, if they do, (some may face palm in embarrassment) because Biden is not in any position to do any harm, except to his reputation. If he were president it would not be a laughing matter.

He also sees no problem with Biden's age; "may be 72, but he’s a vigorous and healthy 72, whom nobody doubts could handle the demands of the presidency." Where was the press with such an allowance for age when John McCain was constantly being attacked for his age-72- in 2008. McCain's now looking at running for reelection at 80-but, leftist hypocrisy never bothers with reality.

Now, if a Democrat has to be elected, which I hope is not the case, of all current prospective candidates I could live with VP Biden. He could work with the GOP, is not combative by nature, at least from what can be seen by his interactions and lack of negativity from the Republicans.

Further he would, almost certainly, inherit a Republican House and possibly Senate and thus his room for any overt actions would be very limited-I see him in a Gerald Ford amiable sort of role if he did get into the office.

Above all he is a gentleman. Of all the cast of characters from the 2008 election on the Democratic side he stood apart for his amiability, courtesy, dignity and kind words towards Governor Palin which was clearly seen during their debate.

Biden 2016? Far worse things have happened.

M.Joseph Sheppard Post Report 06/24/15 Father Pfleger Hillary Video Hit/Trump For President? It's Kristol Clear

Will Father Michael Pfleger reprise his "HILLARY" routine for the 2016 campaign-a laugh a minute.

***************************************************************************** The

Art of the Con, by Donald Trump - Kevin Williamson, National Review

Trump Is Running, But the Joke's On You - Charles Gasparino, Daily Beast

From beyond the fringe, it’s Donald Trump. Again. Jeff Jacoby Boston Globe

Three massive hit jobs from the "Conservative Voice" the conservative Establishment and the loony left prove that Trump is "over target." Exactly what target he is over is problematical but it is safe to surmise,
I believe, that there is a nascent fear in the above worthies minds (and the rest of the GOP Establishment) that Trump might actually do well.

And, right on schedule, a new poll comes out showing Trump leapfrogging Paul, Cruz, Walker, Rubio to second place in New Hampshire-only a few points behind Jeb Bush, and he hasn't got started yet! What these worthies need to do is to climb down from the snobbery of their respective high horses and do a proper evaluation of Trump's populist message and see how that is resonating with the base.

I am joking of course-pigs will fly before that happens. To get, what has been the only balanced view so far we have to turn to, of all people, Bill Kristol whom so many decry as a patrician and the last they'd expect a balanced Trump view from-but, and good for him, he has provided it.

Writing in The Weekly Standard "

Kristol, after making it clear Trump is last on his list of preferred candidates he asks the unasked question

"What might we learn from listening to Trump?"
Trump understands that Americans aspire to greatness. His campaign slogan is “Make America Great Again.” Sound familiar? A prominent Ronald Reagan slogan in 1980 was “Let’s Make America Great Again.” In his announcement speech Trump repeated several times—and repetition may not be as foolish in politics as all the pundits who disapproved of Trump’s verbosity think—that “we are going to make our country great again.” And he concluded his remarks, “Sadly, the American dream is dead. But if I get elected president I will bring it back bigger and better and stronger than ever before, and we will make America great again.” Politics is about dreams as much as it is about deliverables, about pride as much as it’s about pocketbooks. Trump understands that. It’s not clear most of the rest of the field does."

And "Trump understands that Americans like winning:"
"Trump understands that Americans have deep doubts about the competence and probity of our political class. It’s not clear most of the rest of the field does." "Trump understands that Republican primary voters don’t want a nominee who will shy away from criticism of President Obama"

Kristol concludes, astutely :"But Trump could win significant support from Perot-type voters in primaries who will then be up for grabs in the general election."
He could have added: "Republican primary voters don’t want a nominee who will shy away from criticism of Hillary Clinton" which seems to be a major failing of the field so far.

If Trump moves into the lead in New Hampshire, which is entirely possible, and starts to move up in Iowa then it is all on. The obvious fear, disguised by snobbery, from the wonk class will turn to outright panic. Unfortunately for them Trump has the resources to fight back hard, which he would not shy away from.

Bill Clinton is no political fool and can see the wood for the trees as Kristol points out "Bill Clinton has already begun sweet-talking him: Trump “has been . . . uncommonly nice to Hillary and me.' The GOP establishment might well be advised to take note before they are swept away in a Trump tide and it is too late for them to get on the gravy train. Can you say Palin and Trump?? It would be worth it to see the collective heads of the media, left and right explode violently.

Tuesday, June 23, 2015

Update:Collection Of 8 Confederate Flag "Election Obama/Hillary 2016/Bill/Carter" Buttons

Gateway Pundit

In Uniform

JIMMY CARTER

Star Honors the Confederate Flag (Bill Clinton Proclamation)

Thursday, June 18, 2015

Translated From Spanish: "Moosecon" Drops Cruz Support Praises Trump & Palin's Support

From "Moosecon" (original Spanish HERE )

WAITER ... another table, PLEASE!

Posted on 06/18/2015of moosecon

Where there are ten fit twelve o'clock ... And fourteen! And sixteen! Here we all fit! I do not know if there will be enough voters for each candidate, but as one of them gets done with only 10% of the vote in any state, and is the winner by far. And wait to see who will arm when allocating seats in the televised debates! Those who do not enter into the debate cry to heaven for the injustice done to them saying it is not true that only three of his voters in that state and the three intoxicated andthose who do, will be lucky if they can get the camera to focus them more than a minute in any retransmission, ha ha ha. I am eager for the arrival of the first debate of August 6. I will annoy the holidays, but no matter; these Republican primaries are almost better than one might imagine and can rest assured that we will not have a how are you in the next hundred years. Are all that need to be (in the absence of some little will take to take the final step, as Walker, Kasich, Jindal or Christie) and some who should not, but still add excitement to the matter. Only one thing could definitely turn these primaries in the best in American political history, well you know what I mean: the presence of Sarah Palin on them. Of course I would be delighted to be present! Do not doubt for a moment my palinismo extreme! But by dint of palinista, I am also realistic and I remain convinced that we will not have the pleasure of seeing announcing his candidacy, which if it did, it would be the largest and most Morrocotudo surprise of the story, and that's something nobody You expect it now, even I, already. (Well, yes, yes you, but they do not want to listen to me, heh, heh, heh).

Anyway, today we have a new edition of the renowned "Thermometer GRGP". We include two new names (and almost no room for more) and, very sadly, another one rung falls, from red hot to hot to dry ... Who would have thought it!

Cruz stumbled on, I've been thinking long and, even though it causes me a lot, I think I can not fool you (or fool myself) and is forced to take it into account. It is not just that Cruz support a legislative measure which robbed the legislature of its powers to deposit them in the hands of the executive branch (and what executive power!), it was also agreed that this occurs by a process surprising why the text of the legislative measure was stolen to public scrutiny and was considered so secret that members of Congress who want to read it (which were not all, of course), they had to do it in a secret unit of the Capitol building.That's nothing conservative, Ted! In fact, it's a real bitch and although I have been reading your explanations and evaluating them coldly, I have no excuse. Bad you weigh, the more correct position on this issue is what has kept Rand Paul, refusing to give their support to this monstrosity of law and making public their disagreement. Cruz, have blundered and no doubt your reasons've had, but it weighs and the "Thermometer GRGP" is inexorable: the moment, you fall only one step because you're still the most conservative of all candidates announced and, as he says Santi, "the best scribe check a blur," but you know I'm thinking even if you do not have to climb another rung to Paul that it is winning by far, but still have not made up my mind (suggestions are welcome, by the way) .

After the bad news, we have the good: he has come "The Donald"! Indeed, the entry in the running of Donald Trump is the most exciting we have so far. I already said yesterday that Sean Hannity himself said he was "a strike of adrenaline. " True to form, Trump filed his candidacy in the building, Trump Tower, making a dramatic entrance. And his presentation speech was not wasted either, leaving gems like "I do not need anyone's money. I'm really rich "," I will build a great wall along the southern border and I will make Mexico pay it "," The United States has become the dustbin of the problems around the world "," How our leaders are stupid, how stupid are our politicians, to let this happen? "and, finally, expressly dedicated to the poor Bush:" How the hell can vote for this guy? ".Ah, what a pleasure to finally hear someone without mincing words!

Okay, okay, much of this is nothing more than bluster, but ... But beware Trump; however clownish whatever their style at first glance, he is the only one with a real presidential defined political program yet. And anyone can read it; It is written in a book in 2011 entitled him Time to Get Tough: Making America # 1 Again ( Time to get tough: Making America No. 1 again ). In that book, Trump explains with clarity what its policies if elected President of the United States. For example, addressing OPEC resorting to existing anti-trust legislation in the country; deal with China and ring traps that makes its currency to adjust the value of its imports to its actual value; -better reform back the other way round, the tax system by eliminating a lot of taxes and lowering rates remaining; finish the border fence in the south, expel illegal immigrants convicted, comprehensive immigration reform, etc. And how are you, many more; so many that it is difficult to detail them all here, and above all, describe the basis on which they are based each, which are by no means mere platitudes and fantasies, but are very firmly rooted in history, tradition and legislation from United States. Again, it is true that Trump has a way of being that moves to take it as a histrionic, but none is as simple as it seems at first sight and anyone looking to take a joke to his presidential Trump in this adventure without having had a look before the part "serious" of his personality, he does at his own expense.

In fact, if Trump does appear serious, informed and forceful in televised debates and let thank for irrelevant now, it could well become the new Ross Perot (remember that this Texan billionaire managed to take 19% of the national vote in 1992 ). And such a performance in the Republican primary, by a candidate who has all the money needed to pay their own election campaign and a history of success after success throughout their lives, could well change the rules and lead to an outcome surprising: Trump 2016.

By the way, I completely took me seriously and, after seeing his presentation, I decided to take my mind any preconceived ideas I had about it and start from scratch. Especially after checking that the only note he has published so far Sarah Palin mentioning a candidate by his name he has dedicated to him! Here it is:

realDonaldTrump - Mr. Trump should know you're doing something right when they get unhappy like a rocket in the press! You can not deny the achievements of Donald J. Trump and his drive to create opportunities for all Americans willing to succeed. His own success is a testament to the achievements of jobs created that are possible when one applies the brave and tenacious precepts in favor of the private sector that we need to turn the economy. Trump joins competitive roster of candidates who will fight in the arena of ideas and histories, a field representing various achievements. This contrasts with the practice in favor of big government than simply anoint a chosen, therefore, stealing a healthy debate to voters.

The key to the Conservative victory is to our own vetting of each candidate, focusing on their ability to release the entrepreneurial spirit of the United States and drastically reduce the size of government in order to give priority to the security of our nation.That means that we set aside the participation of the media in the little game of liberal politics of personal destruction. Then, with a level playing field, we charge forward in 2016 until the radical left hears the cry of the United States: "You're fired!".

For my part, I'm thinking that Trump could well be my second choice, if Cruz fails to take over the primary. And yes, I'm serious. And thinking about a possible Trump-Palin 2016. Can you see him? ¿Trump television debate with Clinton and no silent or under water, is telling all who will not listen and having to endure because Trump pays homage to him no one in this world? Think a bit about it and you tell me. For now, I leave Trump to step up a rung on the "Thermometer GRGP".

Moreover, we also have Bush finally RINO and are happy. He must be a bit annoyed because the surprising appearance of Trump on the very next day he announced his candidacy campaign, has stolen much of the limelight. Nth Bush ran as a conservative and tried to make us believe that it is stoking Obama, but thereupon announcing that "solve" the immigration problem by adopting appropriate legislation. And we all know in what sense will this legislation! Simply making laws based permanent what Obama has done so far with temporary executive decrees. Ja, another dog with that bone! The best symbol of what is false that all this is in Bush himself, who has decided to stand under the slogan: "Jeb" Bush so trying that does not appear anywhere, as if anyone could forget who he is .

For my part, Bush (to hell with "Jeb", Bush!) Has been located in the depths of the "thermometer GRGP" confident that over the weeks will end up sinking further, reaching rock bottom. I'm not sure how it will affect this Chris Christie, the other favorite candidateestablishment , whom now I do see no possibility, but do not rule out the end of presenting his candidacy, even because so many people appearing, which is not arises is that does not exist. In this way, we would completely end the firing of RINO, with Bush as a leader, Christie second Rubio as a substitute and Pataki as errand boy. A true dream team , right?

This is about to start for real. Missing Walker, who is said to be presented in July, Kasich, Jindal and perhaps Christie. And maybe some more of who speaks not much right now.Fifteen or sixteen candidates are going to need several hours a day to learn what each one does. It will be interesting to know who wait until the last minute ... and if both lengthening waiting, achieved "qualify" for the first debate of the Fox. It will be a discussion of the most important for what that who gives first gives twice. It will serve to highlight the best you have done and so have an initial "favorite". And with that band, the candidate in question will gain an added boost that may well make the first breach between him and the other is opened. We'll see what happens. You do not know the desire I have that come August. I want to see them be skinned, ha ha ha! And, again, very careful Trump. Who underestimate, commits a serious error. And you see, Sarah has not done at all.

¿Cruz? ¿Trump? ¿Captain America? ... Ah, how easy it would be if Sarah is present!

PRIMARY TIME, TIME TO FIGHT ...In "Republican Primary 2016"

READY, SET, GO! (II)In "Presidential Elections 2016"

COCHRAN ... YOUR NAME SOUNDS cockroach. OF THIS YOU WILL AGREE!In "Republican Primary 2014"