Tuesday, January 3, 2012

Iowa Result-They Don't Want Romney; Romney 25% (25% In 2008!) Non-Romney 75%



The writing on the wall; Iowa's Caucus result;
Romney 25 % 
Non-Romney 75 %


Or in even starker than that terms-Romney actually received the same percentage that he did in 2008!






One could of course divide out any of the non-Romney's e.g. Gingrich, and get a stark result e.g. Gingrich 14 % Non-Gingrich 
  84% but that  of course misses the point altogether.


The point is that Romney is supposed to be the inevitable nominee, the owner of the "next in line, it's his turn" mantle. That flies in the face of the consistent Iowa polling and tonight's result. Let's face facts, what we see in Iowa is Christian conservatives/libertarians 76%  RINO/Beltway/Mormon 24 %   


The rank and file don't want Romney. He may win in New Hampshire, but the polls so far show that the majority of Republicans in Iowa, South Carolina, and Florida don't want him. 


Neither does a massive 75% of GOP voters nationwide;




It may be an anti-RINO feeling which may dissipate to some degree come November, but reading conservative blogs there is a dogged determination not to vote for a RINO this time. 


If Romney does get the nomination, via the fracturing of the conservative vote, the  subsequent stay at home level of usual GOP voters could doom his campaign-if Trump and Gary Johnson have not done so anyway.


CONSERVATIVES4PALIN had this prescient  view of the subsequent Iowa caucus results;

Isn’t it time for Newt to consider taking a dive in New Hampshire by telling two-thirds of his supporters in New Hampshire to purposefully vote for Paul in New Hampshire in the hopes that Paul can deliver a crushing blow to Romney in the state? After all, wouldn’t Newt take 5% in New Hampshire if it meant that Paul beat Romney by a 36-34 margin in NH because Gingrich’s voters strategically played Mitt like a fiddle? The short-run success of the Ron Paul Revolution may help make the long-run success of the Palin revolution possible.
What continues to be amazing about the media coverage of Mitt Romney is that he will likely win fewer votes in the 2012 Iowa caucuses than the number of votes he won in the 2008 Iowa caucuses despite the fact he’s facing significantly weaker competition in 2012 than he faced in 2008 and yet the media will declare him one of the winners if he finishes in second or third place

If Santorum's Iowa Win Means Brokered Convention It Was Best Possible Result







Santorum has "won" Iowa, whatever the final vote count it being so close and him doing so outstandingly well,as predicted by Stacy McCain at "The Other McCain", against all the odds.


Look-the GOP base doesn't want Romney. He received 25% of the vote in Iowa which means that 75% prefer a non-Romney. Further, and even starker, he actually received the same percent of the Iowa vote than he did in 2008!




Although I am a strong Palin supporter and, since she is not running at present I have urged conservatives to support Newt Gingrich, I now urge New Hampshire voters to support Ron Paul as I similarly urged Iowa caucus goers.


The latest polling from New Hampshire, shows only three candidates with a realistic chance of winning, Unfortunately Gingrich, although polling in third place behind Paul is not one of them. 


However, we have to deal with the world as we find it. I don't think Santorum has, in the remaining time left to make his case, the winning of New Hampshire, or for that matter Florida. If he loses both I can't see him winning anywhere else.


Newt is too far off the pace in New Hampshire as are Bachmann and the rest and surely she is now finished. That leaves Romney and Paul. I will never vote for Romney, and am confident that a large number of conservatives feel the same. 


I am also confident that if he is the nominee then Trump will run and the GOP should at that point give up and just support the down tickets to take the senate and hold the house (see my "Palin candidacy only insurance Trump won't run and ensure Obama's re-election).


Thus, in my opinion the very best thing for the GOP would be for Ron Paul, following his  strong showing in Iowa, to win or do very well in New Hampshire ( and of course in Virginia where Newt isn't on the ballot at this time). If that were the case then Gingrich would have a very good chance in Florida and South Carolina and the possibility of a deadlocked convention would be very real. 


If that happens then what is the reality now, as someone said, the "office seeking the woman" would come into play and Sarah Palin would stand every chance of being drafted in Tampa.


For that reason I urge Palin/Gingrich/Santorum/Bachmann supporters (Perry appears to think he still has a chance, as quixotic as that hope may be) to vote for Ron Paul. I personally would not vote for him in any other states but Iowa and New Hampshire and Virginia if I had the vote there, but to vote for him in those two states is good common sense in my opinion. 


Of course each of the candidates supporters would rather see their candidate win in a brokered convention not Palin, but voting for Paul in N.H. is their best chance too.


Paul will not be the nominee but he can, by following up his strong showing in Iowa with a win, or more likely a solid second place showing in New Hampshire, help to ensure the right person is. With Romney having effectively lost in Iowa-even if he manages to squeak out a tiny plurality, (75% voting against  you is not a "win") being, hopefully, held from running away with the New Hampshire primary, he will run up against the "southern wall" where Gingrich should prosper.


The message couldn't be clearer-the overwhelming majority of Republican voters in Iowa voted for someone else besides Romney. he doesn't have a lock on the nomination, he is not the heir apparent next in line and a brokered convention would let the rank and file choose a genuine conservative.


Further the overwhelming number of GOP voters nationwide 75%+ don't want Romney as the nominee;


NB;I note that "Smitty' ( a Virginia resident) at the influential conservative blog 
The Other McCain, appears, under certain circumstances, willing to consider voting for Paul;
"Could I vote for Ron Paul in a primary as a protest against GOP tomfoolery? It sounds mad, but less so over time. . ."

Gingrich's Iowa Placing Puts Him On Same Nomination Win Path As McCain


Rick Santorum's or Romney's Iowa victory will ultimately have the same meaning as did Huckabee's Iowa victory in 2008. 


Newt ran a respectable fourth tonight, at or better than McCain's 2008 vote percentage, and although he will not win in New Hampshire on present polling, once the southern firewall comes into play he can follow the same path that led John McCain to the nomination.


The 2008 result is looking uncannily  like the 2012 result-same ultimate scenario with different cast of characters with the exception being the inevitable also ran Romney.


Gingrich is currently polling in front in Florida and South Carolina and it is so often South Carolina that determines who the nominee will be. Iowa on the other hand is no guarantee of ultimate victory-ask president Huckabee or the various winners of the Iowa Ames straw poll for example.


Santorum will, deservedly, have his place in the sun until new Hampshire delivers its verdict and when the voting turns south it is hard to discern any path forwards for Santorum past new Hampshire and then into Florida and South Carolina.


Santorum has on the other hand put himself well into contention for the vice-presidency, especially for Romney as he would absolutely shore up the base and remove some of Romney's Mormon problem with the fundamentalist base.


That Santorum VP scenario works well for Gingrich too and gives a counter to the Palin supporters if he doesn't choose her as Santorum would be acceptable as Palin has heaped much praise on him.

Robert Stacy McCain Delivers The Last Word On The Iowa Caucus



Whilst we wait on the Iowa caucus results, renowned journalist Robert Stacy McCain whose media venues include "The Other McCain" website (and who writes famously for The American Spectator where this article first appeared) has an outstanding overview with emphasis on the Santorum campaign.


Will Santorum's surge vindicate the power of prayer?

By  on 1.3.12 @ 6:10AM
ALTOONA, Iowa -- A teenager stood beside the salad bar at Pizza Ranch here Monday night, surrounded by a huge crowd packed into the restaurant for Rick Santorum's final Iowa town hall meeting before Tuesday's caucuses. Carl Cameron of Fox News was there, as was conservative talk-radio host Laura Ingraham and so many reporters and photographers that some Republican voters who had come to see the surging Republican presidential candidate were forced to park in the lot of a nearby Hy-Vee grocery store. This vivid evidence that the former Pennsylvania senator has suddenly become the man of the hour in the Hawkeye State clearly made an impression on the brown-haired girl standing beside the salad bar.
"Our prayers are paying off," said 13-year-old Sarah Maria Santorum, whose father soon emerged from the throng, stood on a chair and addressed the crowd.
"This is our last town hall meeting -- this is number 380," the candidate told his supporters, many of whom have met him multiple times during the past year as he campaigned relentlessly across Iowa. "We're here with the entire family," said Santorum, praising his wife Karen for her support through the long campaign. "We felt that this was what we were called to do, to go out and speak and lay out a vision for this country, a vision that wasn't just about taxes and spending, wasn't just about growth. Yes, it's about all those things and, as you know if you've been to my town hall meetings, I talk a lot about those things. But it's also about what is at the core of our country, the values of this country. It's about faith and family."
For most of the past year, Santorum seemed to have little more than his faith and family to sustain his underdog campaign for the White House. His wife and children have been among his hardest-working volunteers, stuffing envelopes and making phone calls. If he had heeded the pollsters and pundits, he would have quit months ago. His poll numbers were stuck in the single digits and his fundraising was a fraction of the amounts collected by many of his GOP rivals. He got little recognition from the media and many of his campaign stops in the Hawkeye State weren't even covered by the local press. "The national media has done a very good job of ignoring Rick Santorum," he told a few dozen of his supporters at an Iowa event I covered in August, a week before the Ames Straw Poll. He suggested then that the lack of media coverage was a result of bias by liberal journalists who were trying to "suffocate" his campaign.
Whether or not they were trying to suffocate him then, the media are nearly smothering him in coverage now. Reporters from all over the world have descended on the Santorum campaign like a plague of locusts in the past week as polls showed him unexpectedly surging upward in the closing days before Tuesday's first-in-the-nation caucuses. At an overcrowded event Monday afternoon in Boone, where two people passed out and required medical attention, Santorum's press secretary Matt Benyon remarked about the massive media herd, "They're rude. They'll run people over. They nearly even ran over me."
If more media coverage was one item on the Santorum campaign's prayer list, their prayers have paid off beyond their wildest imaginings. And if getting more money was on the list, they're getting lots of that, too. While campaign sources weren't talking dollar amounts, Santorum himself has said they have received more online contributions in the past week than they had received in the past several months. There have been many more unexpected blessings for Santorum, who was flying coach class on his way back from Iowa when I interviewed him barely three weeks ago. The famous Duggar family, whose brood of 20 children have made them reality-TV stars, drove up from Arkansas to join Santorum on the campaign trail in Iowa this week,arriving in a bus decorated with "Santorum for President" signs. "We heard Rick needs some help, so here we are," said the family's 21-year-old son John David Duggar, explaining that Santorum "shares our values the best of all the candidates out there right now."
Those values were under siege yesterday on Fox News, when liberal commentator Alan Colmes criticized the Santorum family as "crazy" for how they coped with the death of their newborn son in 1996. But that criticism backfired and Colmes quickly apologized, so that the net effect was to encourage sympathy for Santorum and his family. When even the attacks of political enemies end up helping a campaign, the faithful may be forgiven for thinking perhaps their prayers really are being answered this week in Iowa. Hopes for a miraculous victory, however, must give way to more pragmatic matters as Santorum's political team tries to generate the final push for votes in Tuesday's caucuses. "I think turnout is going to blow the doors off four years ago," said former Iowa GOP executive director Chuck Laudner, one of the Santorum campaign's top supporters. Speaking of the latest poll numbers, Laudner said, "Our trajectory is up. The only question is, how high can it go?"
Most observers expect Santorum to finish in the top three, but the polls are sufficiently volatile that few are willing to risk a firm prediction. However high Santorum surges Tuesday night, his campaign is prepared to carry their newfound momentum forward from Iowa. While Santorum has campaigned tirelessly in the Hawkeye State, he has not ignored New Hampshire -- home state of his campaign manager, veteran Republican operative Mike Biundo -- and also has built a strong grassroots organization in South Carolina. Several members of Santorum's South Carolina team have come to Iowa to aid in the final push here, and one of them told me during an event Monday, "I'm laughing at all the media that keeps saying Rick doesn't have any organization in South Carolina. He's campaigned in South Carolina more than any other candidate has.… All we needed was a spark, and it looks like we got one."
That spark seems to have started a wildfire for Santorum here in Iowa, where a strong showing might be the first step toward one of the most remarkable comebacks in America political history. Santorum's surge could begin to redeem the pain his family suffered when he was defeated for re-election in Pennsylvania in 2006. (Jeffrey Lord recalls that campaign in his American Spectator column about Santorum today.) It was one of the worst wipeouts in the history of the Republican Party, which lost control of Congress in a landslide election driven largely by the unpopularity of the war in Iraq. Election Night 2006 was a painful one for many Republican, but for few was it more painful than for Santorum and his family. As the senator gave his concession speech that night, TV news cameras zoomed in on eight-year-old Sarah, who clung to a doll and wept uncontrollably. Sarah's tears were mocked by liberal commentators, but inspired a songwriter to compose a tune that was recorded by country music star Martina McBride, the chorus of which says, "Blessed be the child who turns a loving eye and stops to pray for these times in which we live."
Sarah Santorum and the rest of her family have been praying for many years, and tonight in Iowa they will wait for an answer to their prayers.



Fair use notice:This website contains copyrighted material, the use of which may or may not have been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Excerpts of such material is made available for educational purposes, and as such this constitutes 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Act. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this website is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. Original material published on this website may be excerpted and the excerpt reproduced for the purpose of critical reviews. However, such original material may not be reproduced in full on another website or in any manner without prior approval from this website's owner. In all cases when material from this website is reproduced in full or in part, the author and website must be credited by name and a hyperlink provided to this website. 

Monday, January 2, 2012

Dennis Rodman To Coach Topless Women's Basketball; The Triumph of Feminism



AT THIS LINK

At the link above ABC News reports that Dennis Rodman will coach a basketball team composed of topless women for a charity fundraiser. 


The male/female "news" team goes through the required double entendres and requisite smirks with the female anchor feeding the male anchor the quip lines.


Apparently there are actual topless teams in uber-liberal New York-who knew?


Yep-you've come a long way baby. Feminism has achieved a new height where personal degradation is secondary to the interest of self promotion/money/"fame."  


Since there is no hue and cry about this from "feminist" quarters one has to presume that this is totally acceptable, and that feminism is defined as allowing women to do anything they want no matter how degrading.
<a href="http://msn.foxsports.com/video?videoid=843d30a7-7abb-470a-9bfa-18613bbdba76&amp;src=v5:embed::" target="_new" title="Stripped of the Ball">Video: Stripped of the Ball</a>


This is "The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire" stuff, and surely it is just a matter of time before not just men, but topless women will appear as real life, battle to the death, gladiators in arenas. 


These "games" will be set up by an elite, desperate to keep power, for the entertainment of howling mobs, as a diversion from the economic collapse ensuing from the degradation of the money supply.


America the beautiful.

We're not sure what's going to feel ickier, the fact that Dennis Rodman is going to be holding tryouts for a topless women's basketball team in New York City, or you after you finish reading the post. But the Basketball Hall of Famer will be trying out and coaching a team fielding exotic dancers from Headquarters Gentleman Club, in hopes of cobbling together a charity game against what appears to be another topless women's basketball from a rival club.
Duty calls, apparently, for Rodman. As it does here at Ball Don't Lie. Gross.
The NBA bad boy dreamed up the team after hearing that rival strip joint Rick's Cabaret launched a league with former Atlanta Hawk Spud Webb, who runs the Texas Legends, an NBA Development League team.
Rodman even is challenging Rick's Cabaret's topless team to a charity game.
"I don't know too many men that don't like a good-looking woman running up and down around the court," Rodman said.
Not really. I like a good looking woman running, walking, or standing just about anywhere. And while I'm not exactly innocent in frequenting these sorts of places in my lifetime, if you're so desperate to see a topless woman that you'll even take in a basketball game featuring 10 of them running up and down a court and (presumably) playing rather poorly, then it's time to re-assess your life as we spark up the year 2012.
The whole thing is more sad than alluring, by a wide margin. As is the case for most of these topless clubs, and Rodman's life (if we're honest) over the last 13 years.