Palin Hater Writes Column Ridiculing Her "Wee Wee'd Up" Phrase Unaware Obama Created It-Such is the Idiocy Of The Left's Palin Hate

Update; Reyes has admitted his incompetence at the link and also subtly changed the title and the story to make it look like he knew Palin"borrowed" the phrase from Obama. But we know the truth.
**************************************************


Ordinarily the blatherings of the obscure Robert Paul Reyes who has contributed a column AT THIS LINK about Sarah Palin to the equally obscure SOP (Student Operated Press) would not be worthy of reading, much less commenting on


Any publication with "Student Operated" in the title is nearly always going to be a juvenile, immature left-wing (one and the same of course) emotionally charged rag fuelled by irrational class hatred, and often by testosterone looking for a sublimated outlet. 


SOP (sic) is a classic in that mould, whose sole purpose is to provide memories for folks when they mature and can look back in slightly sheepish embarrassment asking themselves how could they have said and done those things. It's all part of the growing up process.


So why even comment? Because the Reyes column is a classic of its type. Reyes spends an entire column ridiculing Sarah Palin, full blown Palin Derangement Syndrome on display which might be of value for the psychology department. He headlines; "Sarah Palin  Invents New Catchphrase; Wee-Wee'd Up! God have Mercy"


Here is the gist  of his remarks;

Sarah Palin recently said that the "lame-stream" media is getting all "wee-weed up" over Rick Santorum`s Satan speech. The former beauty queen has her own language, it`s not exactly Pig Latin, but it sure ain`t Shakespeare. I`m familiar with most of Palin`s folksy sayings, I know that she`s "Mama Grizzly" and I know that the "lame-stream" media is any new outlet that isn`t Fox News.

But what the heck does "wee-weed up" mean? It sounds like what a dude will do to himself after he`s guzzled over a dozen beers.

And then he continues on in a rather childish fashion in the same manner, describing Palin's remarks as "babbling nonsense." What Reyes is obviously too immature and lacking in awareness of the political scene he pretends to be a commentator on, to know and understand, is that Palin is using the phrase "wee-wee'd up" in an ironic sense-which she has done many times before.


Here is a video clip of President Obama using the phrase; 
AT THIS LINK


The phrase was invented, or at least brought to wider public awareness, by President Obama who used it in a fit of pique when going on the attack. It obviously tickled Palin's fancy, and she has used it back at him a number of times. 


Rather that being the ditz that Reyes and his ilk set her out to be she shows, once again, her shrewdness and exposes the leftists PDS, and their childishness, in the process. 


How embarrassing for Reyes who should learn to do a simple Google search before rushing out to attack Palin.

World Turns Upside Down;Ann Coulter Let’s Face it, Romney’s Not the Establishment Candidate, Palin Is!

The GOP has a fever and only a Palin candidacy can cure it-folks are going mad


From; Conservatives4Palin;

Ann Coulter: Let’s Face it, Romney’s Not the Establishment Candidate, Palin Is!

Posted on February 22 2012 - 8:12 PM - Posted by: Doug Brady

This is so sublimely asinine that I can’t even think of anything to write: I’m flabbergasted (I always wanted to use that word in a post). For that reason I’ll post her idiocy without comment and let you all discuss the depths to which the once credible Coulter has descended in her defense of the Mittster, whose stated positions make him only marginally less liberal than Obama (emphasis mine):

The chestnut about Mitt Romney being pushed on unsuspecting conservatives by “the Establishment” is the exact opposite of the truth. The Establishment, by any sensible definition, is virulently opposed to Romney — and for completely contradictory reasons.

The entire NFM (non-Fox media) hate Romney because he is the only candidate who stands a chance of beating Obama.

Meanwhile, many of the pillars of the conservative establishment also implacably oppose Romney. Fox News is neutral, but its second-highest-rated host, Sean Hannity, is anti-Romney, as is prominent Fox News contributor Sarah Palin — who has also offered herself up as a possible presidential nominee at a contested convention. (Wouldn’t a former candidate for vice president on a major party’s ticket be part of the Establishment?)

CNN;"Palin Loyalists from 2008 Campaign Hosting Reporters Conference Call About "Game Change" Distortions

UPDATE; Pushback against the Game Change lies and distortion is under way.
***************************************************************************

This tweet from a righteously angry now former HBO subscriber;


Also, Big Hollywood makes this interesting point :
AT THIS LINK

Big Hollywood: Does HBO’s ‘Game Change’ Legally Meet the Definition of an ‘In-Kind Contribution to Barack Obama’?

As I suggested previously, the one thing these leftist Hollywood types understand is losing money. Let's hope enough people cancel so they get the message.

*********************************************************************
Further to my previous post below, which pointed out the upcoming leftist/Hollywood/HBO hatchet job on Sarah Palin, it seems folks are taking action to hit them where it hurts-in the back pocket.


I suggested a boycott of HBO would be the most effective answer to the hit job, along with total silence about the film when it comes out. They love controversy as it brings in eyeballs, and if the expected backlash from Palin supporters doesn't happen, and the film gets panned, it will be a disaster for the financial backers. They clearly gambled on Palin running, and this film being a nail in her campaigns coffin, but they gambled wrong.


If thousands of Palin supporters, and even some fair minded folks fed up with the disgusting state of the political world, cancel, and-as the people cancelling have done, advise HBO why they are cancelling, it just might, make a difference going forwards.


In the meantime this sort of thing, one example from a number, has to hurt-and a good thing too. If done in the tens of thousands...ouch.

UPDATE; Mark Whittington at Yahoo Voices makes similar points in his attack in HBO/Hollywood liberals AT THIS LINK


The only possible good that might eventuate from the latest leftist Palin hit piece, the HBO "blockbuster" Game Change, is that it shows, once again, and seemingly ad infinitum, the never ending attacks on Palin by the liberal element in society.


The other possible gain would be that if enough folks boycott it, and it is a financial flop the attacks might stop. A faint hope I know, but one thing they do understand is money and if the Palin attacks hit them in the back pocket that might shut them up for a while.


The shows producers obviously counted on Palin being a candidate, and assumed that this tell all fantasy would be a nail in her campaigns coffin. How they must have cursed when she announced she was not running-along with the execrable Joe McGinniss and the entire tribe of Palin haters/bloggers/talk show hosts.


That the producers have stated that the show would not be a hit piece was so transparent that even ABC have commented that reviewers don't see it that way. It is, like the book that preceded it, simply an attempt to make money whilst attacking a conservative woman.


The left is in a bit of a bind as they have now taken to shouting "she's irrelevant". They can't have it both ways (or actually with leftist hypocrisy they can try). Either this is an "impartial" movie presenting facts about a key figure in American political life who is thus totally relevant, or she is a nobody whose 15 minutes of fame are up-go figure.


The best thing that can be done is for conservatives to not swallow the bait (following Palin's lead as below) and attack the movie and the actors. If it ignored, and quietly boycotted, the lack of publicity, and hopefully comments from fair minded people about the bias, will doom it to financial destruction and hopefully take down the originators with it.

HBO’s critics on the Right were apparently right about the network’s upcoming movie “Game Change,” about Sen. John McCain’s run for the presidency in 2008.

While the network claimed the movie would be even-handed politically, it seems Sarah Palin doesn’t come off too well in the trailer.

Critics decried the HBO film from the get-go as a hit piece on the former Alaska governor who became the target of a merciless media and political barrage after McCain chose her as his running mate.

There’s been no comment yet from Palin about the trailer for “Game Change.”

"HBO I Just Cancelled Your Ass" Good-That's the Best Response To "Game Change"

This tweet from a righteously angry now former HBO subscriber;


Also, Big Hollywood makes this interesting point :
AT THIS LINK

Big Hollywood: Does HBO’s ‘Game Change’ Legally Meet the Definition of an ‘In-Kind Contribution to Barack Obama’?

As I suggested previously, the one thing these leftist Hollywood types understand is losing money. Let's hope enough people cancel so they get the message.

*********************************************************************
Further to my previous post below, which pointed out the upcoming leftist/Hollywood/HBO hatchet job on Sarah Palin, it seems folks are taking action to hit them where it hurts-in the back pocket.


I suggested a boycott of HBO would be the most effective answer to the hit job, along with total silence about the film when it comes out. They love controversy as it brings in eyeballs, and if the expected backlash from Palin supporters doesn't happen, and the film gets panned, it will be a disaster for the financial backers. They clearly gambled on Palin running, and this film being a nail in her campaigns coffin, but they gambled wrong.


If thousands of Palin supporters, and even some fair minded folks fed up with the disgusting state of the political world, cancel, and-as the people cancelling have done, advise HBO why they are cancelling, it just might, make a difference going forwards.


In the meantime this sort of thing, one example from a number, has to hurt-and a good thing too. If done in the tens of thousands...ouch.

UPDATE; Mark Whittington at Yahoo Voices makes similar points in his attack in HBO/Hollywood liberals AT THIS LINK


The only possible good that might eventuate from the latest leftist Palin hit piece, the HBO "blockbuster" Game Change, is that it shows, once again, and seemingly ad infinitum, the never ending attacks on Palin by the liberal element in society.


The other possible gain would be that if enough folks boycott it, and it is a financial flop the attacks might stop. A faint hope I know, but one thing they do understand is money and if the Palin attacks hit them in the back pocket that might shut them up for a while.


The shows producers obviously counted on Palin being a candidate, and assumed that this tell all fantasy would be a nail in her campaigns coffin. How they must have cursed when she announced she was not running-along with the execrable Joe McGinniss and the entire tribe of Palin haters/bloggers/talk show hosts.


That the producers have stated that the show would not be a hit piece was so transparent that even ABC have commented that reviewers don't see it that way. It is, like the book that preceded it, simply an attempt to make money whilst attacking a conservative woman.


The left is in a bit of a bind as they have now taken to shouting "she's irrelevant". They can't have it both ways (or actually with leftist hypocrisy they can try). Either this is an "impartial" movie presenting facts about a key figure in American political life who is thus totally relevant, or she is a nobody whose 15 minutes of fame are up-go figure.


The best thing that can be done is for conservatives to not swallow the bait (following Palin's lead as below) and attack the movie and the actors. If it ignored, and quietly boycotted, the lack of publicity, and hopefully comments from fair minded people about the bias, will doom it to financial destruction and hopefully take down the originators with it.

HBO’s critics on the Right were apparently right about the network’s upcoming movie “Game Change,” about Sen. John McCain’s run for the presidency in 2008.

While the network claimed the movie would be even-handed politically, it seems Sarah Palin doesn’t come off too well in the trailer.

Critics decried the HBO film from the get-go as a hit piece on the former Alaska governor who became the target of a merciless media and political barrage after McCain chose her as his running mate.

There’s been no comment yet from Palin about the trailer for “Game Change.”

Ms. Doom And Gloom And Inflationary Depression Nadeem Walayat's Latest Wonderful Report

As I have mentioned before I am a great fan of 
"The Market Oracle" AT THIS LINK the home of gold bugs, doom and gloomers, and all manner of economic analysts. There are charts galore, and whatever ones financial outlook you are sure to find it massaged there. 


Whether one could actually make any money from the wisdom of these collected seers is a matter above my pay grade, but one thing is certain, there is plenty of advice.


My particular favorite is the inestimable Nadeem Walayat. This gentlewoman is endlessly entertaining, and, to my mind, often wise and right in his observations-particularly when she castigates the hucksters. 


Who could argue with his pithy observations that despite the constant revelations from economists and economic commentators that there will be a massive market downturn, it keep steadily rising- as it has done for the last three years.


There are many other, staring you in the face facts, that are so obvious observations which make Ms. Walayat such a pleasure to read. As I understand her, there will be a money printing day of reckoning, which will come when all the current doomsters turn optimistic, which sounds like further common sense.


I can't recommend her highly enough AT THIS LINK Certainly I don't subscribe to all she concludes, rather I find her like Ron Paul. Some of whose ideas I find very attractive, others not quite so, but always interesting and thought provoking.