Images Of Anti-Palin Media Women Who Share A Common Characteristic-Can You Guess What It Is?

Here are a few photographs of Sarah Palin from the time when she burst on the scene in 2008 to now. They are followed by photographs of media women who have been strident critics of her-to the point of obsessive PDS (Palin Derangement Syndrome) in some cases.

Viewers may note a difference relating to physiognomy which might not be a million miles away from the deep seated reason for such mad obsessive behaviour on exhibit

Joan Walsh PDS Queen at Salon

Jennifer Rubin supposed "conservative" at the Washington Post"

Sad photo of Chelsea Hoffman writer of "Is Sarah Palin getting a divorce?" and other such idiocies





"Taylor Marsh" Hillary dead-ender and Palin  hater extraordinary "Former Miss Missouri" (Don't "show me" in this case)

Weirdo with strange overbite Malia Litman  described at Free Republic as  "Noted Palin Hating Whack-Job Malia Litman "who blogs obsessively about Palin

From the Beltway elite Palin hating press Maureen Dowd

More Beltway elite anti-Palin snobbery from Peggy Noonan

Melissa McEwan of "Shakesville (ultra-radical feminist hate site)

Fair Use Notice

FAIR USE NOTICE:
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in an effort to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc.
We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.
For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
TITLE 17 > CHAPTER 1 > § 107
§ 107. LIMITATIONS ON EXCLUSIVE RIGHTS: FAIR USE
Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright.
In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include—
(1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes;
(2) the nature of the copyrighted work;
(3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and
(4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work.
The fact that a work is unpublished shall not itself bar a finding of fair use if such finding is made upon consideration of all the above factors.
Copyright issues e-mail to: 
holprof57@yahoo.com