Friday, August 16, 2013

Poll; Vote Who Is The Most Palin Derangement Syndrome (PDS) Afflicted Media Woman

Thanks so much for reading our blog. It makes you part of the smartest, most diverse and open-minded community on the web.
That's why we've begun a new experiment in web economics: no ads; no corporate owners; just readers paying for content they enjoy and value. For unlimited access to every post in its entirety , we're asking for a subscription of either $19.99 a year or $1.99 a month - or more if you really love us. Via Paypal




It is an interesting exercise to determine who the public consider the most PDS afflicted media woman so I have listed some of the most prominent for readers to cast their ballots.

If you have the stomach to see pictures of some of these harridans it is at THIS LINK 

Before I get accused of misogyny let me say yes, of course many many men are also PDS afflicted, but their PDS usually runs from servile writing to appease/please their media paymasters or just plain mischief making (e.g. "Gryphen" at Immoral Minority") for page views. The genuinely PDS afflicted men are beyond the sad cattiness and general ugliness which causes much female PDS, and they are simple deranged e.g. "Patrick" or womb obsessed "Sully"

That said here is the sad candidate list for "Female presence in the media with the most Palin Derangement Syndrome."

Fair Use Notice


This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in an effort to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc.
We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.
For more information go to:
TITLE 17 > CHAPTER 1 > § 107
Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright.
In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include—
(1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes;
(2) the nature of the copyrighted work;
(3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and
(4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work.
The fact that a work is unpublished shall not itself bar a finding of fair use if such finding is made upon consideration of all the above factors.
Copyright issues e-mail to:

No comments: