Sunday, October 9, 2011

Either Jon Stewart or Palin's Brother Are Disingenuous Propagandists-Is It Stewart?

Commenting on Sarah Palin 's announcement that she is not going to run for president Stewart indicates she is a "crazy person". This from one who is supposedly the fair and balanced face of liberalism.

That he has descended into the pit of Palin Derangement Syndrome by his show distorting Palin's words-a method he castigates Fox for was revealed in a previous episode. Stewart is clearly no better that any of the rabid liberals at MSNBC he just sugar coats it behind a veil of on the surface nice-guyism.

Here is Stewart darkly ascribing "Nigerian prince" methods to Palin and

"The only way Sarah Palin's fundraising scheme would be dishonorable is if she had known her decision all along yet continued to dangle her indecision as a lure to donors."

He purports to show that Palin had decided in June not to run,according to her daughter Bristol's
naive statement where she "spilled the beans'. the inference is, clearly, that palin has been taking her supporters for suckers by milking money from them on the basis that if they did support her Sarahpac financially she might run.

What Stewart does not mention-which blows his whole premise to bits is that Palin's brother-Chuck heath said the following (emphasis mine);

I" would like to personally thank all of you who have worked so hard and really thrown your hearts into supporting Sarah. I, like many of you, was really disappointed in her decision but I completely understand it. I don’t think there are many people out there who could begin to understand the scrutiny her family has been under. As for you who think that Sarah strung you along; as late as last week, right after I interviewed with Steve Bannon, I talked with Sarah and she was still pushing hard and contemplating a run. After a lot of prayers, and finally, through respect for her own family’s wishes, she chose to wait this one out.
Be assured that Sarah’s not done. She will continue to be a force in the political world and I’m sure she’ll be holding whoever’s elected in any important upcoming elections accountable for their actions. In my opinion, I believe she’ll arise again even stronger than before.
Please try to respect her decision, and once again, thank you so much for the support you’ve shown her.
Chuck Heath, Jr.
Sarah’s brother"
What Stewart didn't state was that Bristol may or may not have been correct in her earlier statement, and that Sarah  may have indeed decided in June, one way or the other  but, as is perfectly logical in response to changing events, changed her mind sometimes after June. In the light of Stewart's program and Heath's statement it can only be concluded that one is correct and the other is a disingenuous spreader of a liberal agenda which disregards the facts. It is clear to me which is which.

No comments: