Wednesday, February 15, 2012

Santorum's Economic Policies Are Solidly Conservative,Palinite, And Worth Supporting

The Yahoo "The Ticket" review  by Zachary Roth of Rick Santorum's economic polices advises they are conservative "they stick to the standard GOP script." Yes they are, and Yahoo does a service bringing the other side of the Santorum equation, his economic overview, to the public's view.

The social side of Santorum's mind-set is well know and is of course solidly, and, as opposed to Romney's, unchanging and is, to me, for the most part, highly acceptable. That it is acceptable to the majority of social conservatives in general is shown by Santorum's huge rise in poll support as Romney declines. 

A decline brought on in no small part by more attention being brought to his changing views. This attention being drawn to most especially by Sarah Palin who has said, time and time again, that she is not convinced that Romney is a true conservative.

As the possibility of Santorum being the nominee grows it is vital to now consider his economic plans. Yahoo actually goes on to praise Santorum for having an emphasis on the poor. 

This is of course in stark contrast to Romney whose, perhaps fatal, statement that he was not concerned about them (as they have enough safety nets). I disagree with Yahoo's summing up however where they conclude that Santorum's plans are not fleshed out enough and the remedy for the seemingly intractable position of the poor is not  made clear.

The rising tide lifts all boats wisdom applies. If Santorum's plans lead to economic growth and the opportunity  for jobs that would provide coupled with an emphasis on skills training that would be the solution to poverty.

Endless government handouts,projects, food stamps clearly have failed if we still have mass unemployment and poverty amidst plenty. No leftist arguments,platitudes and charges of racism can counter that simple fact.

Lets look at Santorum's plans and see if they form part of the solution. For me they do, and under a Santorum presidency they would be a powerful tool to growth.


How Santorum, unafraid to talk about poverty, differs from GOP on economic policy

By Zachary Roth-The Ticket 
Rick Santorum at CPAC (Jose Luis Magana/AP)
As he's shot to the top of national polls of the Republican presidential race lately, Rick Santorum's stance on social issues has garnered most of the attention, while his economic policies have taken a backseat. But with the former Pennsylvania senator set to give a speech on the economy Thursday in Detroit, let's look at what a President Santorum would do on jobs, taxes, and spending.
Much of Santorum's plan, which he calls "made in America" is firmly in keeping with modern-day Republican orthodoxy: he would dramatically cut spending, insist on balanced budgets, flatten the tax code, cut corporate taxes, repeal "Obamacare," privatize Medicare, and audit the Federal Reserve. But other aspects, like his policies and rhetoric addressing poverty and the working class, are more surprising and veer away from party doctrine.
Santorum would cut federal spending by $5 trillion over five years, and pare non-defense spending back to 2008 levels -- a reduction of around 30 percent from 2012. He also backs a balanced budget amendment, which would limit federal spending to 18 percent of gross domestic product -- around $2.6 trillion for this year. He even wants to stop lawmakers from being paid if they don't pass fiscally responsible spending bills on time.
The plan also calls for a flatter tax code, with just two income tax rates: 28 percent, and 10 percent. That would likely mean an income tax cut for many of the richest Americans, who currently pay a 35 percent rate, though Santorum also pledges to eliminate "most deductions," which tend to benefit the rich. And he would cut the capital gains tax from 15 percent to 12 percent, which would help Wall Street professionals and others who make money through investments.
His plan would also likely mean a cut for many of the tens of millions of households making between $17,400 and around $50,000. They'd presumably fall into the 10 percent bracket, down from the 15 percent rate they currently pay. In keeping with his traditional views on social issues, Santorum also wants to encourage family formation (he and his wife have six children themselves), by tripling the personal deduction for each child, and by scrapping marriage tax penalties.
Unlike Mitt Romney, Santorum has said he opposed a rise in the minimum wage, although he wouldn't scrap the concept altogether, as some in his party would. As well as auditing the Fed, he'd have it focus only on controlling inflation, and not on promoting employment. Santorum supports Rep. Paul Ryan's plan to save money by transforming Medicare into a system of private insurance. And like every 2012 Republican presidential candidate current or former, he'd repeal President Obama's health-care law.
So far, that's a plan that sticks pretty closely to the standard GOP script. But other aspects of Santorum's proposal set him apart from his party, by grappling with issues of concern to Americans further down the economic spectrum.
Again like most of his GOP rivals, Santorum would lower the corporate tax rate. But he'd establish two new rates: 17.5 percent -- a 50 percent cut from the current 35 percent rate -- for most businesses, and zero for manufacturers. The goal, his website says, is to "multiply job opportunities for struggling middle-income families and renew communities that have lost critical manufacturing jobs."
In campaign appearances and debate performances, Santorum has often appeared eager to reinforce that focus on restoring middle-class jobs -- implicitly bucking the standard Republican line that derides issues of economic inequality and mobility as class warfare.
"We need to talk about income mobility," he implored his party at a Republican debate on economic issues in November, noting the sky-high jobless rate for Americans without college degrees. "We need to talk about people at the bottom of the income scale being able to get necessary skills and rise so they can support themselves and a family."
By the same token, Santorum hasn't shied away from mentioning poverty. "I don't believe that poverty is a permanent condition," he declares in the plan. "How do we effectively address poverty in rural and urban America? We promote jobs, marriage, quality education and access to capital and embrace the supports of civil society."
That's an approach that differs from President Obama and most Democrats, by placing less emphasis on the government safety net. But it also stands in contrast to most of Santorum's rivals in the Republican race, where the word poverty has barely been mentioned, despite a record number of Americans living in poverty.
What does all this mean for the economy? It's difficult to say, in part because the plan lacks specifics in some areas, and the campaign didn't respond to several requests from Yahoo News to provide them. With the level of spending cuts that Santorum wants to balance the budget, and no major stimulus outlined beyond tax cuts, his stated goal of 4-4.5 percent growth in his first term seems unlikely. But if nothing else, Santorum's willingness to at least pay lip service to the concerns of struggling Americans suggests a broader focus than that of many of his rivals.

Fair use notice:This website contains copyrighted material, the use of which may or may not have been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Excerpts of such material is made available for educational purposes, and as such this constitutes 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Act. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this website is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. Original material published on this website may be excerpted and the excerpt reproduced for the purpose of critical reviews. However, such original material may not be reproduced in full on another website or in any manner without prior approval from this website's owner. In all cases when material from this website is reproduced in full or in part, the author and website must be credited by name and a hyperlink provided to this website.

No comments: